UU Christology Wanted

Fellow blogger Philocrites is hoping for a renewed UU christology and this is what I have answered in the comments section of his blog:

Our Unitarian tradition has never had a clear consistent¹ christology, so it is hard to start one now. We have wandered from a variety of modalism (Servetus) to non-adorantism (Dávid), and back to adorantism to a human-becoming-divine being (Socinus), varieties of Arianism, then Jesus as divine messenger and miracle-worker, to Jesus the moral prophet, the feminist, and the revolutionary rebel. Which one will be next? Jesus the Pagan? (there are already some "Christo-Pagans" around...).

I hope that the upcoming publication of the proceedings of the 2006 ICUU Theological Symposium (one of the essays included was presented by yours truly) will help to clarify the current state of U+U theology (or perhaps make it even more confusing ;-)).

Notes:
¹ Thanks to Scott Wells for his correction.